Minggu, 06 Maret 2011

Allomorph



An allomorph is a linguistics term for a variant form of a morpheme. The concept occurs when a unit of meaning can vary in sound (phonologically) without changing meaning. It is used in linguistics to explain the comprehension of variations in sound for a specific morpheme.

ALLOMORPHS: It frequently happens that a particular morpheme is not represented everywhere by the same morph, but by different morphs in different environments. The alternative phonological manifestations or representations of such a morpheme are called allomorphs, or 'morpheme alternates' or 'morpheme variants'. Gleason defines allomorphs as, "a variant of a morpheme which occurs in certain definable

Allomorphy in English suffixes




English has several morphemes that vary in sound but not in meaning. Examples include the past tense and the plural morphemes.

For example, in English, a past tense morpheme is -ed. It occurs in several allomorphs depending on its phonological environment, assimilating voicing of the previous segment or inserting a schwa when following an alveolar stop:

as /əd/ or /ɪd/ in verbs whose stem ends with the alveolar stops /t/ or /d/, such as 'hunted' /hʌntəd/ or 'banded' /bændəd/

as /t/ in verbs whose stem ends with voiceless phonemes other than /t/, such as 'fished' /fɪʃt/

as /d/ in verbs whose stem ends voiced phonemes other than /d/, such as 'buzzed' /bʌzd/

Notice the "other than" restrictions above. This is a common fact about allomorphy: if the allomorphy conditions are ordered from most restrictive (in this case, after an alveolar stop) to least restrictive, then the first matching case usually "wins". Thus, the above conditions could be re-written as follows:

as /əd/ or /ɪd/ when the stem ends with the alveolar stops /t/ or /d/

as /t/ when the stem ends with voiceless phonemes

as /d/ elsewhere

The fact that the /t/ allomorph does not appear after stem-final /t/, despite the fact that the latter is voiceless, is then explained by the fact that /əd/ appears in that environment, together with the fact that the environments are ordered. Likewise, the fact that the /d/ allomorph does not appear after stem-final /d/ is because the earlier clause for the /əd/ allomorph takes priority; and the fact that the /d/ allomorph does not appear after stem-final voiceless phonemes is because the preceding clause for the /t/ takes priority.

Irregular past tense forms, such as "broke" or "was/ were", can be seen as still more specific cases (since they are confined to certain lexical items, like the verb "break"), which therefore take priority over the general cases listed above.

There are three allomorphs of the stem: /vaːk/, /vaːt​͡ʃ/ and /vaːɡ/. The allomorphs are conditioned by the particular case-marking suffixes.

The form of the stem /vaːk/, found in the nominative singular and locative plural, is the etymological form of the morpheme. Pre-Indic palatalization of velars resulted in the variant form /vaːt​͡ʃ/, which was initially phonologically conditioned. This conditioning can still be seen in the Locative Singular form, where the /t​͡ʃ/ is followed by the high front vowel /i/.

But subsequent merging of /e/ and /o/ into /a/ made the alternation unpredictable on phonetic grounds in the Genitive case (both Singular and Plural), as well as the Nominative Plural and Instrumental Singular. Hence, this allomorphy was no longer directly relatable to phonological processes.

Phonological conditioning also accounts for the /vaːɡ/ form found in the Instrumental Plural, where the /ɡ/ assimilates in voicing to the following /bʱ/.

 

Example

Here are some examples of allomorphs. In English, the negative prefix in has several allomorphs:

  • In-capable

  • Il-logical

  • Im-probable

  • Ir-reverent




environments". For instance, the plural morpheme has generally three representations, i.e. allomorphs. They are /-s/ in /k ts/, /-z/ in /d gz/ and /-iz/ in /h siz/.

Allomorphs are of two types:

1. Phonologically conditioned allomorphs, and

2. Morphologically conditioned allomorphs.

1. PHONOLOGICALLY CONDITIONED ALLOMORPHS: When the allomorphs are conditioned by the phonetic nature of the preceding phoneme, they are said to be phonologically conditioned allomorphs. For example, the three allomorphs of the plural morphemes are represented by /-s/ occurs after voiceless sounds, /-z/ occurs after voiced sounds and /-iz/ occurs after groove fricatives and affricates. So these allomorphs are called phonologically conditioned allomorphs.

2. MORPHOLOGICALLY CONDITIONED ALLOMORPHS: When allomorphs are determined by the specific morpheme or morphemes forming the content, rather than by phonological features, they are called morphologically conditioned allomorphs i.e. / / which only occurs with three morphemes. They are ox / ks/, brother /b r r/, and child /caild/.

After discussing the concept of allomorphs we may define a morpheme in a different way also as "a morpheme is a class of allomorphs, which are symmetrically similar and are in complementary distribution.


 

 

 

 

 

 

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar

Entri yang Diunggulkan

Makalah Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia

Posting Populer